Search This Blog

Showing posts with label leadership Idea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leadership Idea. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

STAGES OF STRESS



 
i.    The Alarm Stage: This is a warning stage, this stage clearly signals the presence of stress agents in the body, and in turn there are physical reactions which tend to be the first to appear. These reactions warns the individual that he has to be on guard as there are stress agents present in the body, and once the individual is aware of these, he or she can take measures to face the problem and solve them. When this is done the effects or aftermath of stress is reduced or not materialized at all. Stress may be from one or multiple sources combined together.

ii.  The Resistance Stage: When stress is not curtailed during the alarming stage, it goes further to enter into the resistance stage. In this stage the individual will start to notice some signs that will slow his/her action down. The individual might suddenly realize that he is losing lot of energy and conduction level of the body becomes lower than usual. At this stage something needs to be done in order for him/her to survive, and he/she does not know that he/she is in a vicious circle, then tries to complete the task ahead but finds out that it is practically impossible and this calls for major concern to him/her as failure is not an option given the task in hand.
iii.The Exhaustion Stage: This stage is the final stage and is characterized by fatigue, accompanied by nervousness, irritability, tension and anger. The individual becomes anxious and not only when he/she is faced by stress factors but also in moments which would not normally produce any anxiety. This further leads to depression and this means lacking pressure in an activity or activities, the individual suffers from dizziness and the thoughts of the individual are pessimistic and negative.

Sunday, 23 June 2013

Barriers to Effective Communication



Barriers to effective communication can be seen as those factors which militate against the effective communication in any organization. These barriers can exist in any process of communication such as in the sending of the message, transmitting of the message or in receiving of the message. The success of any communication process is retarded if it is faced with the barriers.

        According to Ogunsaju (1983) in a situation where messages are poorly sent or if an action is not effected the system cannot plan or operate properly. He further stressed that as message become more complex, meaning and interpretation become more complicated and more dependent on a common field of understanding between the sender and the receiver. Therefore in order to avoid communication barriers, organization managers must recognize the common difficulties people encounter in trying to understand each other during the communication process.
        According to Dittimiya as cited in Adiotomre and Avwata (2007) barriers to effective communication are classified into four categories and they are as follows:
i.    Intrapersonal Factors: There are two types of barriers under this category. Selective perception and individual differences in communication skills. Selective perception occurs when people block out or distort new information, especially if it conflicts with what they believe. The result is that the receiver interprets the message transmitted quite differently from the intent of the sender. In addition to selective perception, people also differ in their ability to develop and apply basic communication skills. For instance, some people are able to read but find it difficult to comprehend, others are unable to express themselves verbally but are able to write clear and concise messages. When such difficulties exist they are potential barriers to effective communication.
ii.  Interpersonal Factors: This category includes climate, trust, credibility and sender-receiver similarity. Climate refers to the relationship between a superior and a subordinate arising from the attitudes and treatment each receives from the other. The lack of positive relation between the communicator and the receiver may lead to the distortion of the intended messages. Similarly, lack of credibility, distrust and suspicion between a superior and a subordinate can lead to less likelihood of effective communication. Furthermore, the degree of similarity between the sender and receiver in terms of such characteristics as frames of reference, age, sex, intelligence, socio-economic status and common attitude will affect the effectiveness of communication.
iii.Organizational Factors: Organizational barriers to effective communication include hierarchical differentiation, time, pressure, network breakdown and status differences. The bigger the organizational structure, the more layers a message must pass through to get to those at the lower levels; the more the levels a message must pass through, the longer it takes to reach its destination and the less likely it is to be accurate (Bedeian, 1980).
Furthermore, the size of the workforce is likely to affect the accuracy of communications. The larger an organization, the less likelihood that adequate communication will be achieved. Network breakdown is another factor that can bring about ineffective communication in an organization. Finally, status differences may create problems that block upward communication because sometimes, subordinates do not wish to express an option that is different from that of their superordinate.
iv. Technological Factor: The most important factor here is that of information overload. The school administrator may have difficulty making a decision or communication, not because of the absence of information but because of excessive information. Sometimes school administrators are so overloaded with information and data that they cannot absorb or respond adequately to all the messages directed to them. The result is that “they screen out” the majority of messages and consequently do not respond to all.

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Strategies to Reduce the Constraints to Effective Implementation of UBE





We must realize that basic education goes beyond literacy and numeracy. It embraces all kinds of basic knowledge and useful life. We must therefore, encourage children to develop a scientific outlook and rudimentary understanding of the natural and social environment. We can achieve this by not confining the children to classroom situation alone. In seeking to achieve the objectives of the programme, vigorous efforts must be made to counter the factors that may hinder the attainment of the stated objectives. It is envisaged that more appropriate approaches will have to be developed to improve the implementation of the programme as stated below:
1.  Ensuring proper data collection/accurate statistic;
2.  Prudent management of educational fund;
3.  Effective planning;
4.  Providing adequate infrastructural facilities;
5.  Providing enriched curricula;
6.  Ensuring adequate funding;
7.  Management of the entire process;
8.  Procurement of textbooks and instructional materials;
9.  Taking proper care of teachers; their recruitment, education, training, retraining, motivation and other needs;
Encouraging public enlightenment and social mobilization, for full community involvement.
ORDER FOR THIS MATERIAL NOW, CALL +2347034538881

Sunday, 16 June 2013

Education and Counselling



Schools are temples of learning and education is preparation for life. Aim of education is all round development and harmonious adjustment of an individual in various aspects of his life. If this is to be achieved, then education is not limited to imparting knowledge as the duty of a teacher and accumulating knowledge as the duty of a student (Ofordile, 2002 & Macloed, 2003). The unique potentialities of each individual along with environmental opportunities will have to be taken into account in making the individual capable of contributing maximum to the society.
Thus for self-realization of the individual, guidance and counselling service is needed. Counselling is a form of education extended to an individual in a scientific manner (Adegoke, 2004).

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Research Method and Procedure FOR A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT



 

Research Method and Procedure

        This chapter is devoted to the method employed for data execution of this study. It covered: research design, population of the study, sample and sampling procedure, research instrument, validation of the instrument, reliability of the instrument, method of data collection and method of data analysis.

Research Design

        This study adopted a survey research design. This is because the study sought the opinion of respondents on the factors militating against the effective teaching and learning of mathematics.

Population of the Study

        The population of the study consists of all the senior secondary school students in both public and private secondary schools in Uvwie Local Government Area of Delta State.

Sample and Sampling Procedure

        The schools were stratified into private and public schools. 15 private and 15 public secondary schools were randomly selected from all the schools in the Local Government Area. From each of the selected schools, 16 students were randomly selected from all the schools, giving a sample size of 480 students that constituted the sample for the study.

Research Instrument

        The instrument used for the study was achievement test scores of the students in mathematics, obtained from the records section of the sampled schools.

Validation of the Instrument

        The achievement test scores have already been validated by the mathematics teachers; hence there was no need for further validation.

Reliability of the Instrument

        The achievement test scores were reliable since they tend to judge the position of the students academically with respect to their performance in mathematics.

Method of Data Collection

        The data collected were gathered through the score sheet of the sampled students in the schools.

Method of Data Analysis

        In analyzing the data collected, the researcher used t-test to answer the hypotheses.


References

Agbatogun, A.O. (2009). School Factors as Predictors of Junior Secondary School Students’ Attitude towards Schooling and Academic Achievement in Social Studies. An Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation, Institute of Education, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye.
Arigbabu, A.A. & Oludipe, D.I. (2004). Relationship between Prior Mathematics Knowledge and Students’ Academic Performance in Integrated Science. Journal of the Science Teachers’ Association, 39 (1&2), 52 – 55.
Broward County Public Schools (2006). Policy Statement: Public Vs Private Education. Published at Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, USA.
Bureau of Labour Statistics (2006). Secretaries and Administrative Assistants. Retrieved on 18th October, 2006 from http://www.bls.gov/home.htm
Eckstein, M.A. (1982). Comparative Study of Achievement. Reprinted with permission of Macmillan Library Reference USA, a Division of Simon & Schister Inc., from Encyclopedia of Education Research, 5thEdition, Vol. 1, pp. 323 – 329.
Glickman, C. (1991).  Pretending not to know what we know. Educational Leadership, 48, 4 – 10.
 


 ORDER FOR YOUR MATERIAL NOW, CALL +2347034538881